Talk:Server List - Revision history

imported>BomBardyGamer: Reordering update

2021-04-11T14:24:46Z

Reordering update

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:24, 11 April 2021
Line 46:		Line 46:
	:: "I mean, isn't this the whole point of the wiki anyway?"		:: "I mean, isn't this the whole point of the wiki anyway?"
	:: No, not at all. It's a repository of knowledge, and how you use it is up to you. I have no issue leaving proprietary licensed projects (of which there are so few up to date this feels like a moot issue). [[User:TkTech\|TkTech]] ([[User talk:TkTech\|talk]]) 19:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)		:: No, not at all. It's a repository of knowledge, and how you use it is up to you. I have no issue leaving proprietary licensed projects (of which there are so few up to date this feels like a moot issue). [[User:TkTech\|TkTech]] ([[User talk:TkTech\|talk]]) 19:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

			: I'm going to start the reordering today, as I believe this is well overdue by now. Feel free to revert any changes that you're not happy with.
			: --[[User:BomBardyGamer\|BomBardyGamer]] ([[User talk:BomBardyGamer\|talk]]) 15:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

imported>TkTech at 19:30, 25 February 2021

2021-02-25T19:30:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 25 February 2021
Line 43:		Line 43:
	: I also suggest that all entries that are not open-source be removed, as I believe that we should be promoting open-source on this wiki. I mean, isn't this the whole point of the wiki anyway? To promote open-source? Isn't that why we provide as much documentation as we can on the backend of Minecraft freely for anyone to view?		: I also suggest that all entries that are not open-source be removed, as I believe that we should be promoting open-source on this wiki. I mean, isn't this the whole point of the wiki anyway? To promote open-source? Isn't that why we provide as much documentation as we can on the backend of Minecraft freely for anyone to view?
	: --[[User:BomBardyGamer\|BomBardyGamer]] ([[User talk:BomBardyGamer\|talk]]) 15:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)		: --[[User:BomBardyGamer\|BomBardyGamer]] ([[User talk:BomBardyGamer\|talk]]) 15:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

			:: "I mean, isn't this the whole point of the wiki anyway?"
			:: No, not at all. It's a repository of knowledge, and how you use it is up to you. I have no issue leaving proprietary licensed projects (of which there are so few up to date this feels like a moot issue). [[User:TkTech\|TkTech]] ([[User talk:TkTech\|talk]]) 19:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

imported>BomBardyGamer: /* Order of entries */

2021-02-25T15:40:42Z

Order of entries

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 25 February 2021
Line 35:		Line 35:
	: - Then by the project activity state (as obviously active projects are more desirable) This sorting will most likely not be important at the top of the list as only active projects are going to add latest support anyways.		: - Then by the project activity state (as obviously active projects are more desirable) This sorting will most likely not be important at the top of the list as only active projects are going to add latest support anyways.
	: --[[User:Phoenix616\|Phoenix616]] ([[User talk:Phoenix616\|talk]]) 15:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)		: --[[User:Phoenix616\|Phoenix616]] ([[User talk:Phoenix616\|talk]]) 15:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

			: I propose we restructure the page something like this:
			: - A section at the top for servers that support the latest version, ordered by development status followed by alphabetically.
			: - A section for servers that are either in active development and still working to support the latest version, or are inactive but support a version maybe in the range of 1.12-1.15? Or 1.8-1.15?
			: - An obsolete section, filled with servers that are inactive and support a version older than 1.12/1.8 (depending on what is decided).
			:
			: I also suggest that all entries that are not open-source be removed, as I believe that we should be promoting open-source on this wiki. I mean, isn't this the whole point of the wiki anyway? To promote open-source? Isn't that why we provide as much documentation as we can on the backend of Minecraft freely for anyone to view?
			: --[[User:BomBardyGamer\|BomBardyGamer]] ([[User talk:BomBardyGamer\|talk]]) 15:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

imported>BomBardyGamer: /* Page restructure */

2021-02-25T15:39:06Z

Page restructure

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 25 February 2021
Line 35:		Line 35:
	: - Then by the project activity state (as obviously active projects are more desirable) This sorting will most likely not be important at the top of the list as only active projects are going to add latest support anyways.		: - Then by the project activity state (as obviously active projects are more desirable) This sorting will most likely not be important at the top of the list as only active projects are going to add latest support anyways.
	: --[[User:Phoenix616\|Phoenix616]] ([[User talk:Phoenix616\|talk]]) 15:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)		: --[[User:Phoenix616\|Phoenix616]] ([[User talk:Phoenix616\|talk]]) 15:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

	~~== Page restructure ==~~

	~~I've been looking a bit at this page, and it seems like a mess right now. It can be difficult to find what you're after, and there is no ordering or categories.~~

	~~I propose we restructure the page something like this:~~
	~~- A section at the top for servers that support the latest version, ordered by development status followed by alphabetically.~~
	~~- A section for servers that are either in active development and still working to support the latest version, or are inactive but support a version maybe in the range of 1.12-1.15? Or 1.8-1.15?~~
	~~- An obsolete section, filled with servers that are inactive and support a version older than 1.12/1.8 (depending on what is decided).~~

	I also suggest that all entries that are not open-source be removed, as I believe that we should be promoting open-source on this wiki. I mean, isn't this the whole point of the wiki anyway? To promote open-source? Isn't that why we provide as much documentation as we can on the backend of Minecraft freely for anyone to view?

	~~If you have any suggestions, feel free to reply to me.~~
	~~- BomBardyGamer~~

imported>BomBardyGamer: /* Page restructure */ new section

2021-02-25T15:38:10Z

Page restructure: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 25 February 2021
Line 35:		Line 35:
	: - Then by the project activity state (as obviously active projects are more desirable) This sorting will most likely not be important at the top of the list as only active projects are going to add latest support anyways.		: - Then by the project activity state (as obviously active projects are more desirable) This sorting will most likely not be important at the top of the list as only active projects are going to add latest support anyways.
	: --[[User:Phoenix616\|Phoenix616]] ([[User talk:Phoenix616\|talk]]) 15:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)		: --[[User:Phoenix616\|Phoenix616]] ([[User talk:Phoenix616\|talk]]) 15:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

			== Page restructure ==

			I've been looking a bit at this page, and it seems like a mess right now. It can be difficult to find what you're after, and there is no ordering or categories.

			I propose we restructure the page something like this:
			- A section at the top for servers that support the latest version, ordered by development status followed by alphabetically.
			- A section for servers that are either in active development and still working to support the latest version, or are inactive but support a version maybe in the range of 1.12-1.15? Or 1.8-1.15?
			- An obsolete section, filled with servers that are inactive and support a version older than 1.12/1.8 (depending on what is decided).

			I also suggest that all entries that are not open-source be removed, as I believe that we should be promoting open-source on this wiki. I mean, isn't this the whole point of the wiki anyway? To promote open-source? Isn't that why we provide as much documentation as we can on the backend of Minecraft freely for anyone to view?

			If you have any suggestions, feel free to reply to me.
			- BomBardyGamer

imported>Phoenix616: /* Order of entries */ Order suggestion (and add signing of previous message)

2021-02-25T15:28:38Z

Order of entries: Order suggestion (and add signing of previous message)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 25 February 2021
Line 29:		Line 29:
	Since revision 16438 got undone in revision 16444 I have to ask how the entries are ordered?		Since revision 16438 got undone in revision 16444 I have to ask how the entries are ordered?
	From what I'm seeing the newer projects are on the top, while older (and often outdated) projects are on the bottom of the list.		From what I'm seeing the newer projects are on the top, while older (and often outdated) projects are on the bottom of the list.
	Having a mix where newer projects are on the bottom, somewhat older projects on the top and the oldest projects in the middle makes absolutely no sense to me.		Having a mix where newer projects are on the bottom, somewhat older projects on the top and the oldest projects in the middle makes absolutely no sense to me. [[User:Geolykt\|Geolykt]] ([[User talk:Geolykt\|talk]]) 11:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

			: I believe that the list should be sorted in this order:
			: - First by the highest supported version (in a descending order) as it's more likely that a server that supports the current version is what someone is looking for.
			: - Then by the project activity state (as obviously active projects are more desirable) This sorting will most likely not be important at the top of the list as only active projects are going to add latest support anyways.
			: --[[User:Phoenix616\|Phoenix616]] ([[User talk:Phoenix616\|talk]]) 15:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

imported>Geolykt: /* Order of entries */ new section

2021-02-25T11:55:19Z

Order of entries: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:55, 25 February 2021
Line 24:		Line 24:

	: None of the servers in the list are based on NMS (as far as I can see), so I highly doubt they belong in there. [[User:Geolykt\|Geolykt]] ([[User talk:Geolykt\|talk]]) 12:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)		: None of the servers in the list are based on NMS (as far as I can see), so I highly doubt they belong in there. [[User:Geolykt\|Geolykt]] ([[User talk:Geolykt\|talk]]) 12:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

			== Order of entries ==

			Since revision 16438 got undone in revision 16444 I have to ask how the entries are ordered?
			From what I'm seeing the newer projects are on the top, while older (and often outdated) projects are on the bottom of the list.
			Having a mix where newer projects are on the bottom, somewhat older projects on the top and the oldest projects in the middle makes absolutely no sense to me.

imported>Geolykt: /* Add NMS argument */

2021-02-15T12:16:19Z

Add NMS argument

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 15 February 2021
Line 22:		Line 22:

	These are great servers for the newest Minecraft version, and compatible with Spigot plugins.		These are great servers for the newest Minecraft version, and compatible with Spigot plugins.

			: None of the servers in the list are based on NMS (as far as I can see), so I highly doubt they belong in there. [[User:Geolykt\|Geolykt]] ([[User talk:Geolykt\|talk]]) 12:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

imported>Poly000: /* AresRPG */

2021-01-30T21:30:58Z

AresRPG

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 30 January 2021
Line 15:		Line 15:

	I stumbled upon [https://github.com/aresrpg/aresrpg AresRPG], but I'm not too sure if this server software fits into this list. It's basically a custom-coded server written in JS for 1.16. What do you guys think? [[User:DimitarBogdanov\|DimitarBogdanov]] ([[User talk:DimitarBogdanov\|talk]]) 17:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)		I stumbled upon [https://github.com/aresrpg/aresrpg AresRPG], but I'm not too sure if this server software fits into this list. It's basically a custom-coded server written in JS for 1.16. What do you guys think? [[User:DimitarBogdanov\|DimitarBogdanov]] ([[User talk:DimitarBogdanov\|talk]]) 17:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


			Personally, yes. [[User:Poly000\|Poly000]] ([[User talk:Poly000\|talk]]) 21:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

	== Add Yatopia, Akarin ==		== Add Yatopia, Akarin ==

	These are great servers for the newest Minecraft version, and compatible with Spigot plugins.		These are great servers for the newest Minecraft version, and compatible with Spigot plugins.

imported>Poly000: /* Add Yatopia, Akarin */ new section

2021-01-30T21:29:13Z

Add Yatopia, Akarin: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 30 January 2021
Line 15:		Line 15:

	I stumbled upon [https://github.com/aresrpg/aresrpg AresRPG], but I'm not too sure if this server software fits into this list. It's basically a custom-coded server written in JS for 1.16. What do you guys think? [[User:DimitarBogdanov\|DimitarBogdanov]] ([[User talk:DimitarBogdanov\|talk]]) 17:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)		I stumbled upon [https://github.com/aresrpg/aresrpg AresRPG], but I'm not too sure if this server software fits into this list. It's basically a custom-coded server written in JS for 1.16. What do you guys think? [[User:DimitarBogdanov\|DimitarBogdanov]] ([[User talk:DimitarBogdanov\|talk]]) 17:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

			== Add Yatopia, Akarin ==

			These are great servers for the newest Minecraft version, and compatible with Spigot plugins.