Talk:Entity metadata - Revision history

imported>WinX64: /* Missing registries */ new section

2023-02-27T04:47:30Z

Missing registries: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:47, 27 February 2023
Line 28:		Line 28:

	:I'm 99% sure that the field is completely unused, at least in 1.11. Field 13 ''was'' used with zombie villagers to store the profession, but is now unused since zombie villagers are a subclass. 14 was is converting, but that was removed from regular zombie in 1.11 and now hands up is there. Though I haven't actually tested what happens when it's set. --[[User:Pokechu22\|Pokechu22]] ([[User talk:Pokechu22\|talk]]) 22:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)		:I'm 99% sure that the field is completely unused, at least in 1.11. Field 13 ''was'' used with zombie villagers to store the profession, but is now unused since zombie villagers are a subclass. 14 was is converting, but that was removed from regular zombie in 1.11 and now hands up is there. Though I haven't actually tested what happens when it's set. --[[User:Pokechu22\|Pokechu22]] ([[User talk:Pokechu22\|talk]]) 22:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

			== Missing registries ==

			As of the latest revision, some of the registries mentioned on the metadata types are missing (minecraft:cat_variant, minecraft:frog_variant, and minecraft:painting_variant). For consistency, would it be better for them to be added here, or relocated to a separate page in order to not clutter this one? Should a full list of registries even be described on the wiki, or is it better to leave it to the user to extract them from the data generators? --[[User:WinX64\|WinX64]] ([[User talk:WinX64\|talk]]) 04:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

imported>Kashike: Kashike moved page Talk:Entities to Talk:Entity metadata: Separating statuses to their own page, renaming existing page to be specific to metadata

2017-11-13T02:04:05Z

Kashike moved page Talk:Entities to Talk:Entity metadata: Separating statuses to their own page, renaming existing page to be specific to metadata

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:04, 13 November 2017
(No difference)

imported>Pokechu22: /* Zombie Metadata Integer */ Reply

2016-12-18T22:15:30Z

Zombie Metadata Integer: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 18 December 2016
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Just tested unused integer and it seems nothing that is has nothing to do with conversiontime instead of age or something like that. Just gave 300 and zombie was small, but I didn't set isBaby boolean. Needs to get checked more detailed.		Just tested unused integer and it seems nothing that is has nothing to do with conversiontime instead of age or something like that. Just gave 300 and zombie was small, but I didn't set isBaby boolean. Needs to get checked more detailed.
	--[[User:DevLen\|DevLen]] ([[User talk:DevLen\|talk]]) 13:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)		--[[User:DevLen\|DevLen]] ([[User talk:DevLen\|talk]]) 13:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

			:I'm 99% sure that the field is completely unused, at least in 1.11. Field 13 ''was'' used with zombie villagers to store the profession, but is now unused since zombie villagers are a subclass. 14 was is converting, but that was removed from regular zombie in 1.11 and now hands up is there. Though I haven't actually tested what happens when it's set. --[[User:Pokechu22\|Pokechu22]] ([[User talk:Pokechu22\|talk]]) 22:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

imported>DevLen: /* Zombie Metadata Integer */

2016-12-18T13:50:07Z

Zombie Metadata Integer

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 18 December 2016
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Marked as unused, but seems to be conversiontime?		Marked as unused, but seems to be conversiontime?
	--[[User:DevLen\|DevLen]] ([[User talk:DevLen\|talk]]) 13:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)		--[[User:DevLen\|DevLen]] ([[User talk:DevLen\|talk]]) 13:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

			Just tested unused integer and it seems nothing that is has nothing to do with conversiontime instead of age or something like that. Just gave 300 and zombie was small, but I didn't set isBaby boolean. Needs to get checked more detailed.
			--[[User:DevLen\|DevLen]] ([[User talk:DevLen\|talk]]) 13:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

imported>DevLen: /* Zombie Metadata Integer */

2016-12-18T13:37:31Z

Zombie Metadata Integer

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 18 December 2016
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Marked as unused, but seems to be conversiontime?		Marked as unused, but seems to be conversiontime?
			--[[User:DevLen\|DevLen]] ([[User talk:DevLen\|talk]]) 13:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

imported>DevLen: /* Zombie Metadata Integer */ new section

2016-12-18T13:36:25Z

Zombie Metadata Integer: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 18 December 2016
Line 18:		Line 18:

	--[[User:Rom1504\|Rom1504]] ([[User talk:Rom1504\|talk]]) 00:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)		--[[User:Rom1504\|Rom1504]] ([[User talk:Rom1504\|talk]]) 00:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

			== Zombie Metadata Integer ==

			Marked as unused, but seems to be conversiontime?

imported>Rom1504: /* Are ids up to date ? */

2015-05-30T00:23:10Z

Are ids up to date ?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:23, 30 May 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:
	I'm trying to figure out which of these 2 pages (the minecraft.gamepedia.com and the wiki.vg ones) need updating (or both)		I'm trying to figure out which of these 2 pages (the minecraft.gamepedia.com and the wiki.vg ones) need updating (or both)
	--[[User:Rom1504\|Rom1504]] ([[User talk:Rom1504\|talk]]) 12:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)		--[[User:Rom1504\|Rom1504]] ([[User talk:Rom1504\|talk]]) 12:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

			Seems ids are out of date : see http://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Talk:Data_values/Entity_IDs

			--[[User:Rom1504\|Rom1504]] ([[User talk:Rom1504\|talk]]) 00:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

imported>Rom1504: /* Are ids up to date ? */

2015-05-29T12:25:57Z

Are ids up to date ?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 29 May 2015
Line 13:		Line 13:

	I'm trying to figure out which of these 2 pages (the minecraft.gamepedia.com and the wiki.vg ones) need updating (or both)		I'm trying to figure out which of these 2 pages (the minecraft.gamepedia.com and the wiki.vg ones) need updating (or both)
			--[[User:Rom1504\|Rom1504]] ([[User talk:Rom1504\|talk]]) 12:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

imported>Rom1504: /* Are ids up to date ? */ new section

2015-05-29T12:23:00Z

Are ids up to date ?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 29 May 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:

	I added a new "Human" entity as it's called in the source code. 18 is indeed the score, and 17 is the number of absorption hearts. 16 is a bit field of some sort, but I haven't looked further into how it's used. If someone wants to dig around, start at https://github.com/Bukkit/mc-dev/blob/c1627dc9cc7505581993eb0fa15597cb36e94244/net/minecraft/server/EntityHuman.java#L1049-L1057 --[[User:Jli\|Jli]] ([[User talk:Jli\|talk]]) 01:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)		I added a new "Human" entity as it's called in the source code. 18 is indeed the score, and 17 is the number of absorption hearts. 16 is a bit field of some sort, but I haven't looked further into how it's used. If someone wants to dig around, start at https://github.com/Bukkit/mc-dev/blob/c1627dc9cc7505581993eb0fa15597cb36e94244/net/minecraft/server/EntityHuman.java#L1049-L1057 --[[User:Jli\|Jli]] ([[User talk:Jli\|talk]]) 01:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

			== Are ids up to date ? ==

			Objects ids are different from http://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Data_values/Entity_IDs , for example : is armor stand 78 or 30 ?

			I'm trying to figure out which of these 2 pages (the minecraft.gamepedia.com and the wiki.vg ones) need updating (or both)

imported>Jli: /* Player metadata */

2014-07-13T01:14:06Z

Player metadata

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 13 July 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:
	After some testing, I found out that index 18 for the player represents the score of the player (or amount of xp orbs, I think?) should I add this as a new Entity? does this already exist elsewhere?--[[User:Hunterbuscus 3rd\|Hunterbuscus 3rd]] ([[User talk:Hunterbuscus 3rd\|talk]]) 06:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)		After some testing, I found out that index 18 for the player represents the score of the player (or amount of xp orbs, I think?) should I add this as a new Entity? does this already exist elsewhere?--[[User:Hunterbuscus 3rd\|Hunterbuscus 3rd]] ([[User talk:Hunterbuscus 3rd\|talk]]) 06:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

	I added a new "Human" entity as it's called in the source code. 18 is indeed the score, and 17 is the number of absorption hearts. 16 is a bit field of some sort, but I haven't looked further into how it's used ~~(see~~ https://github.com/Bukkit/mc-dev/blob/c1627dc9cc7505581993eb0fa15597cb36e94244/net/minecraft/server/EntityHuman.java#L1049-L1057)--[[User:Jli\|Jli]] ([[User talk:Jli\|talk]]) 01:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)		I added a new "Human" entity as it's called in the source code. 18 is indeed the score, and 17 is the number of absorption hearts. 16 is a bit field of some sort, but I haven't looked further into how it's used. If someone wants to dig around, start at https://github.com/Bukkit/mc-dev/blob/c1627dc9cc7505581993eb0fa15597cb36e94244/net/minecraft/server/EntityHuman.java#L1049-L1057 --[[User:Jli\|Jli]] ([[User talk:Jli\|talk]]) 01:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)